Property I: Essays Questions, Fall 2002 (Prof. Whitman)
Essay Question 1 (60 minutes estimated time).
When Uncle Matt Damon wrote his valid will in 1995, he included the following clause:
“I leave my
office building in the State of
Matt
died in 2000 and his will was duly probated.
Ben lived in the State of
The
office building had just one tenant, an internet startup called E-Way. Its lease had commenced in 1995 and it ran
until the end of 2001. E-Way paid rent
of $2,000 per month. This rent was “net”
of all expenses; that is, E-Way also paid the taxes, insurance, utilities, and
routine maintenance expenses of the building.
Ben began collecting the rent as of
In January 2001 E-Way called Ben and advised him that the roof of the building was leaking badly. Ben paid the cost of re-roofing, $10,000, from his own funds. This was only significant repair he ever made on the building.
When
E-Way’s lease expired at the end of 2001, Ben advertised and located a new
tenant, Frank’s EZ Loan Co. Frank’s
needed to have the building remodeled, with a number of new internal partitions
for offices, in order to make the building suitable for its use. Ben spent $20,000 doing so, and Frank’s moved
in on
On
Bruce has consulted you and asked the following questions:
(1) Who owns the office building?
(2) Does JLo owe any money to Ben’s estate on account of the building?
(3) Does Ben’s estate owe any money to JLo on account of the building?
(4) Can JLo obtain an order of partition, and if so, what type of partition will be held and what will be its result?
Please write answers to these questions, considering all plausible arguments and legal theories that the parties might raise. The market value of the building at the time Ben and JLo inherited it was $200,000. Ben’s additional work for Frank’s EZ Loan increased the building’s value to $220,000.
Essay Question 2. (50 minutes estimated time)
Fred
and Wilma Flint owned (as tenants in common) a large tract of vacant land in
the State of
Grantors, Fred and Wilma Flint, hereby grant to Grantee, Grace Food Bank, the following described land. In the event that Grantee shall in the future convey this land to any other owner except a recognized charity, it shall revert to Grantors. [Land description and signatures followed.]
Grace Food Bank constructed a building on the land in 1981 and used it for their charitable work until 1990. In that year they concluded that the building was no longer large enough to house their activities, so they sold the land and building for $100,000 to Joe’s Auto Parts, Inc., which converted the building into a store. Joe’s began operating the store immediately. However, in 1995 Joe’s business dropped so severely that Joe’s closed and removed its inventory for about six months. During this period Joe’s business sign remained on the building and no one else occupied it. With the help of a bankruptcy proceeding, Joe’s satisfied its creditors and reopened; the store has been open without interruption ever since.
All of these events went unnoticed by Fred and Wilma, who were occupied by more serious concerns. In 1989 Fred was convicted of federal tax fraud and sentenced to 5 years in the federal penitentiary. Hence he was in prison when the Food Bank sold the building to Joe’s. Fred was released in 1994 after serving his full term.
Fred and Wilma have recently consulted you. They are unhappy that their building has been converted into an auto parts store, and would like to get it back if possible. Please write a brief analysis of their situation, discussing all relevant legal arguments and advising whether they are entitled to recover their former property. The statute of limitation for the filing of an action in ejectment in Grace is ten years.